Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2898/2026 of SULEMAN KHAN Vs HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS. on 29 September 2026
GAHC010146402026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2898/2026 SULEMAN KHAN S/O. MIRJAN KHAN, R/O. VILLAGE- MANERI, P.O.- CHENGA, P.S.- TARABARI, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2
GAHC010146402026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2898/2026
SULEMAN KHAN
S/O. MIRJAN KHAN, R/O. VILLAGE- MANERI, P.O.- CHENGA, P.S.- TARABARI, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, 6TH FLOOR, ADITYAM BUILDING, LACHIT NAGAR, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-781007, DISTRICT- KAMRUP M, ASSAM
2:AYMANA KHATUN
W/O. ISMAIL KHAN
VILLAGE- BANDELI RESERVE
P.O.- BAHARI HAT
P.S.- TARABARI
DISTRICT- BARPETA
3:ISMAIL KHAN
S/O. MOTALEB KHAN
VILLAGE- BANDELI RESERVE
P.O.- BAHARI HAT
P.S.- TARABARI
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 78130
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A T SARKAR, S. HUSSAIN,S R DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R GOSWAMI(R1), MS. P BORTHAKUR(R1),MS. M
SAIKIA(R1)
Page No.# 2/3
Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0
SULEMAN KHAN
S/O MIRJAN KHANR/O VILLAGE- MANERIP.O.- CHENGAP.S.- TARABARIDISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM
VERSUS
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER6TH FLOOR
ADITYAM BUILDINGLACHIT NAGAR
G.S. ROADGUWAHATI-781007DISTRICT- KAMRUP M
ASSAM
2:AYMANA KHATUN
W/O ISMAIL KHANVILLAGE- BANDELI RESERVEP.O.- BAHARI HATP.S.- TARABARIDISTRICT- BARPETA
3:ISMAIL KHAN
S/O MOTALEB KHANVILLAGE- BANDELI RESERVEP.O.- BAHARI HATP.S.- TARABARIDISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAMPIN- 781302
------------
Advocate for : ABU TALEB SARKAR
Advocate for : appearing for HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30-09-2026 Heard Mr. A T Sarkar, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel representing the respondent no. 1. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 27 days in preferring the connected appeal.
Ms. Borthakur has submitted that she has no objection if the delay is condoned. Further, the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant