Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4993/2026 of SHRI BIDHAN DASGUPTA Vs DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, CACHAR AND 2 ORS on 29 September 2026
GAHC010193642026 2026:GAU-AS:14533-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4993/2026 SHRI BIDHAN DASGUPTA S/O LATE DHIRENDRA DASGUPTA, HKD ROAD, BIDYA SAGAR SARANI, SILCHAR, CACHAR, ASSAM 788005. -VERSUS- 1: DISTRICT COMMISSIONER,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010193642026
2026:GAU-AS:14533-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4993/2026 SHRI BIDHAN DASGUPTA S/O LATE DHIRENDRA DASGUPTA, HKD ROAD, BIDYA SAGAR SARANI, SILCHAR, CACHAR, ASSAM 788005. -VERSUS- 1: DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, CACHAR AND 2 ORS. OFFICE PARA, COURT COMPOUND ROAD, SILCHAR, CACHAR, ASSAM 788001. 2:CANARA BANK THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER SPLSD ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH 2ND FLOOR DEE BEE GRANDE PANJABARI ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM 781022. 3:AUTHORISED OFFICER CANARA BANK SPLSD ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH 2ND FLOOR DEE BEE GRANDE PANJABARI ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM 781022 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. I.S. Mazumdar, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. U. Sharma, Junior Govt. Advocate, Assam for respondent No.1. : Mr. M. Sharma, Standing Counsel, Canara Bank for respondent Nos.2 & 3.
– B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 30.09.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) Mr. I.S. Mazumdar, learned Advocate for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this application in order to enable the petitioner to Page No.# 2/2 file an application for obtaining the certified copy of the order passed by the District Magistrate on the application made by the creditor/Bank for facilitating taking over the possession of the mortgaged property. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant