Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2915/2026 of NEW INDIA ASSURANCE LIMITED COMPANY Vs MD FARID ALI AND 2 ORS. on 29 September 2026
GAHC010179512026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2915/2026 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE LIMITED COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING, 87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI-400001 AND ONE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010179512026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2915/2026
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE LIMITED COMPANY
HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE
BUILDING, 87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI-400001 AND
ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT STAR CITY COMPLEX, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.S. PATH, LACHIT NAGAR, GUWAHATI-781007, AND VARIOUS
DIVISIONAL, BRANCH AND MICRO OFFICES THROUGHOUT THE
COUNTRY
VERSUS
MD FARID ALI AND 2 ORS.
SON OF LATE ISLAM ALI, RESIDENT OF NO.3 DAGAON WARD NO.10 P.O.
AND P.S. - BOKAKHAT, DIST - GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN 785612
2:SHRI AJOY DUTT
SON OF LATE KULADHAR DUTTA
RESIDENT OF AJOY DUTTA BONDED WAREHOUSE RUPAHI ALI
P.O. AND P.S. - JORHAT
DISTRICT - JORHAT
ASSAM
PIN - 785001 .OPPOSITE PARTY / OWNER OF INVOLVED VEHICLE NO. AS- 03/D-2818 ELANTRA CAR
3:SHRI HARMINDRA SINGH
SON OF MAHINDER SINGH
RESIDENT OF NEAR JORHAT TOWN RAILWAY STATION P.O. AND P.S.
JORHAT
DISTRICT - JORHAT
ASSAM
PIN CODE -785001 .OPPOSITE PARTY / DRIVER OF INVOLVED VEHICLE
NO.AS-03/D-2818 ELANTRA CA
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A J SAIKIA, M CHETIA,MR. S PEGU
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30.09.2026
Heard Mr. A J Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S Sarma, learned counsel representing the opposite party no. 2. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 17 days in preferring the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant