Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3155/2026 of SRI PRABHAT PATHAK Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS on 29 September 2026
GAHC010118022026 2026:GAU-AS:14535 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3155/2026 SRI PRABHAT PATHAK S/O-LATE HALADHAR PATHAK, R/O-FLAT NO.PK, RISCON ENCLAVE, SAWKUCHI, P.O-SAWKUCHI, DISTRICT-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. 2: SRI SUDIPTA
GAHC010118022026
2026:GAU-AS:14535
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3155/2026
SRI PRABHAT PATHAK
S/O-LATE HALADHAR PATHAK, R/O-FLAT NO.PK, RISCON ENCLAVE, SAWKUCHI, P.O-SAWKUCHI, DISTRICT-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
2: SRI SUDIPTA SARKAR
S/O-LATE SUBODH SARKER
R/O-DREAMLAND APARTMENT
BARSAPARA
GUWAHATI
P.O-BINOVANAGAR
DISTRICT-KAMRUPM
ASSAM.
3: SRI PURNENDU BIJOY LASKAR
S/O-LATE BINOD CHANDRA LASKAR
R/O-1A
MAYURI RESIDENCY
PRAGATI NAGAR
SATGAON
P.O-UDAYAN VIHAR
DISTRICT-KAMRUPM
ASSAM
4: SRI BIDYUT BARUN SARMAH
S/O-DANDADHAR SARMAH
R/O-VIRAT ENCLAVE
GANESH MANDIR ROAD
BYE LANE NO.11
NEW GUWAHATI
NOONMATI
P.O-NOONMATI
DISTRICT-KAMRUPM
ASSAM
5: SRI KUSHAL DUTTA
S/O- LATE GHANASYAM DUTTA
R/O-DIBANG RESIDENCY
PENSIONPARA PATH
CHANDMATI
P.O-SILPUKHURI DISTRICT-KAMRUPM
ASSAM
6: SRI PANKAJ KUMAR BORTHAKUR
S/O-LATE DEBEN BORTHAKUR
R/O-MOUPIA APARTMENT
HOUSE NO.76
GANESH MANDIR ROAD
P.O-NOONMATI DISTRICT-KAMRUPM
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, LABOUR WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN-781006.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP M DISTRICT
ASSAM.
3:THE BAKIJAI OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE G DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP M DISTRICT
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI-781006
ASSAM
4:THE MANAGEMENT
THE ASSAM TRIBUNE PRIVATE LTD.
ASSAM TRIBUNE GROUP
MRD ROAD
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-781003.
5:ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
GUWAHATI
SHRAM BHAWAN
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U S BORA, MS. P BORAH,MR S BORTHAKUR, SR. ADV.
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. A SANDILYA(R4)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30.09.2026
Ms. P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
Ms. S. Baruah, learned State Counsel, is present.
In view of above, writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant