Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4977/2026 of ABDUL MAZID Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 29 September 2026
GAHC010195852026 2026:GAU-AS:14511 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4977/2026 ABDUL MAZID S/O NUR ALI, RESIDENT OF JAPORIGOG NEAR FIELD, GANESHGURI, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010195852026
2026:GAU-AS:14511
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4977/2026
ABDUL MAZID
S/O NUR ALI, RESIDENT OF JAPORIGOG NEAR FIELD, GANESHGURI, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF LAND, REVENUE AND
DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE DIRECTOR
LAND RECORDS AND SURVEYS ETC.
RUPNAGAR
GUWAHATI-32.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
(ASSAM)
GUWAHATI-32.
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BELTOLA REVENUE CIRCLE
BELTOLA
GUWAHATI-781028
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS S S ZIA, MS T PARASHAR,MS. P GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
30.09.2026
Heard Ms. S.S. Zia, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. A. Bhattacharya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent nos. 1 & 2; and Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 3 & 4. Ms. Zia, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as certain relevant particulars are not incorporated in the writ petition, the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. In view of the above submission made by Ms. Zia, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant