Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/286/2024 of NUR HUSSAIN MOLLAH Vs J. B. EKKA AND 4 ORS. on 28 September 2026
GAHC010107352024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/286/2024 NUR HUSSAIN MOLLAH S/O- MEZER UDDIN MOLLAH, VILL.- MADAIKHALI, P.O. ASHARIKANDI, DIST.DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 784301. VERSUS J. B. EKKA AND 4 ORS. THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010107352024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/286/2024
NUR HUSSAIN MOLLAH
S/O- MEZER UDDIN MOLLAH, VILL.- MADAIKHALI, P.O. ASHARIKANDI, DIST.DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 784301.
VERSUS
J. B. EKKA AND 4 ORS.
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:JAY SHIVANI
THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JURIPAR, PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3:GOKUL CHANDRA BROHMA
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
DHUBRI ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783101.
4:SMT. KEERTHI JALLI
IAS, THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
ASSAM, JURIPAR, PUNJABARI, GUWAHATI-37.
5:DR. B KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY
IAS, ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, MS A KHATUN
Advocate for the Respondent : MR S DUTTA, A K GHOSE(R5),MR S DUTTA(R-3,5),MS. N
BORAH(R-3,5),MR. K KONWAR(R-3,5),MS. N BORAH
Page No.# 2/2
Page 1 of 2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
29.09.2026 Heard Shri M. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri A. K. Ghosh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Shri Ghosh, the learned counsel has placed before this Court a recent order dated 23.09.2026 passed by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Development Department in compliance of the orders connected to the present proceeding. The order shows that the direction of this Court has been considered and necessary orders for release of pension has also been passed w.e.f. the date of regularisation of the service of the petitioner i.e. 10.06.2003. In the considered opinion of this Court, the aspect of wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court in question will not arise. The contempt petition is accordingly closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…