Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4054/2025 of SRI TAPASH KUMAR RAY CHOUDHURY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 28 September 2026
GAHC010145982025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4054/2025 SRI TAPASH KUMAR RAY CHOUDHURY S/O LATE S.KR. ROY CHOUDHURY, RESIDENT OF AMBIAGIRI NAGAR, GUWAHATI, P.O. ZOO-ROAD, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. PIN-781024 VERSUS THE
GAHC010145982025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4054/2025
SRI TAPASH KUMAR RAY CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE S.KR. ROY CHOUDHURY, RESIDENT OF AMBIAGIRI NAGAR, GUWAHATI, P.O. ZOO-ROAD, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. PIN-781024
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, JANATA
BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
ASSAM
3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BORDER ROADS) ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-781003.
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD)
HAJO SAULKUCHI TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION
AMINGAON
GUWAHATI-31
5:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWRD
HAJO TERRITORIAL ROAD SUB-DIVISION
HAJO
KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN-78110
For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. D. Mushahary, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Nath, Sr. GA, Assam BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29.09.2026
Ms. D. Mushahary, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner has already received the Earnest Money Deposit amounting to Rs.4,41,500/- and the Security Deposit amounting to Rs.7,94,532/- and therefore, the Petitioner would not like to further pursue the present proceedings.
2. This Court has also heard Mr. D. Nath, the learned Senior Government Advocate.
3. Taking into account that the amounts have been duly paid as undertaken in Paragraph No.10 of the additional affidavit filed by the Respondent No.2, this Court therefore would not like to precipitate the matter further.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant