Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4871/2026 of SRI DEBASISH BORAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 27 September 2026
GAHC010190542026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4871/2026 SRI DEBASISH BORAH SON OF LATE RADHA KANTA BORAH ALIAS LATE RADHA BORAH, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 263 RAJGARH ROAD, P.O.- SILPUKHURI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010190542026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4871/2026
SRI DEBASISH BORAH
SON OF LATE RADHA KANTA BORAH ALIAS LATE RADHA BORAH, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 263 RAJGARH ROAD, P.O.- SILPUKHURI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM PIN-781003
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY (REVENUE)
DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP(M)
GUWAHATI PIN NO. 781032
3:THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DISPUR CO- DISTRICT
(LAND REVENUE BRANCH) BASISTHA CHARIALI
GUWAHATI PIN-781029
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
BASISTHA CHARIALI
GUWAHATI PIN-781029
5:THE GLAXO SMITH KLINE PHARMACEUTICAL LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
GROUND FLOOR
GSK BUILDING
CHRISTIANBASTI
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI
Page No.# 2/2
KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM PIN-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P P DAS, MR. N BORAH,MR. SURAJIT DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28-09-2026 Heard Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 1; and Mr. H. Sarma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 – 4. Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as certain details are not mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant