Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/481/2026 of SHREE GEETA GAUSHALA PARAMARTH SANSTHA Vs KAILASH CHAND SAMARIA, IAS AND ANR on 27 September 2026
GAHC010196542026 2026:GAU-AS:14435 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/481/2026 SHREE GEETA GAUSHALA PARAMARTH SANSTHA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF TRUSTEE, HANUMAN PRASAD BAHETI, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O BHERUDHAN BAHETI,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010196542026
2026:GAU-AS:14435
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/481/2026
SHREE GEETA GAUSHALA PARAMARTH SANSTHA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF TRUSTEE, HANUMAN PRASAD BAHETI, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O BHERUDHAN BAHETI, SHREE GEETA
ASHRAM, PADUMONI, NH-37, A.T. ROAD, JORHAT- 785010, ASSAM.
VERSUS
KAILASH CHAND SAMARIA, IAS AND ANR
ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FISHERIES, IRRIGATION AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY
DEPARTMENT, D-BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, ROOM NO. 302, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:DR. JAYANTA KUMAR GOSWAMI
M.V. SC.
PH.D.
ACS
SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM-CUM-DIRECTOR
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT
DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY
DEPARTMENT
CHENIKUTHI
GUWAHATI-78100
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. S Chamaria Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. JK Goswami, Standing Counsel, Page No.# 2/2
Animal Husbandry
& Veterinary Dept.
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.09.2026
Heard Mr. S Chamaria, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The present application has been filed alleging willful and deliberate violation to the order dated 22.05.2026 passed in WP(C)No.329/2026.
3. From a perusal of the order, this Court does not find any case of willful and deliberate violation to the order dated 22.05.2026 having been made out.
4. Consequently, the contempt proceedings stands dropped.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant