Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5178/2026 of THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS (CBIC) Vs JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND ANR on 27 September 2026
GAHC010201162026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5178/2026 THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS (CBIC) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110001 VERSUS JITENDRA
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010201162026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5178/2026
THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
(CBIC)
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110001
VERSUS
JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND ANR
PRESENTLY SERVING AS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER/COMMISSIONER
CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND CUSTOMS, RESIDENT OF 48, ARD COMPLEX, SECTOR 13, R K PURAM NEW DELHI 110066
2:UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH THE SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
NORTH BLOCK
NEW DELHI 11000
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C KEYAL, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., FOR CAVEATOR,MR. P P DAS,MR. SURAJIT DAS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28/09/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Jain, Page No.# 2/2 learned counsel for the petitioners, who submits that in terms of Rule 54-B(6) of the Fundamental Rules (FR), the petitioners have the power to review its decision made pursuant to Rule 54-B(1) of the Fundamental Rules. However, the same has not been stated in the impugned order dated 12/06/2026 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, in OA No. 040/00033/2025. He submits that if the petitioners are allowed to make a review of the order passed under Rule 54-B(1) of the FR by way of Rule 54- B(6), he does not wish to press this petition any further.
2. Mr. Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, learned counsel appears for the sole respondent along with Mr. A. Mishra, learned counsel on the strength of caveat no. 1016/2026. Caveat stands discharged.
3. Mr. Mohanty submits that he has got no argument to make in respect of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. In view of the submission made by the counsels for the parties, it is hereby clarified that subsequent to a decision being made by the authorities pursuant to Rule 54-B(1) of the FR, the petitioners have the power to make a review of the decision it makes under Rule 54-B(1), by application of Rule 54- B(6) of the Fundamental Rules.
5. The writ petition is accordingly closed.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant