Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2191/2018 of GOPAL NATH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. on 27 September 2026
GAHC010070342018 2026:GAU-AS:14438 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2191/2018 GOPAL NATH (CHAIRMAN, DHING REGULATED MARKET COMMITTEE, DHING), S/O LATE GOBIN NATH, R/O WARD NO.5, DHING TOWN, PO AND PS DHING, DIST. NAGAON,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010070342018
2026:GAU-AS:14438
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2191/2018
GOPAL NATH
(CHAIRMAN, DHING REGULATED MARKET COMMITTEE, DHING), S/O
LATE GOBIN NATH, R/O WARD NO.5, DHING TOWN, PO AND PS DHING, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782123
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
TO BE REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-06
2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.OF ASSAM
AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI-22
4:THE ASSAM STATE AGRICULTRE MARKETING BOARD
TO BE REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ULUBARI
RAM KRISHNA MISSION ROAD
GUWAHATI-781007
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NAGAON
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM-CUM-CHAIRMAN
ELECTION AUTHORITY
DHING REGULATED MARKET COMMITTEE
Page No.# 2/2
DHING
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
6:THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER
NAGAON
DIST. NAGOAN
ASSAM
7:THE SECRETARY
DHING REGULATED MARKET COMMITTEE
DHING
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78212
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.A. I. Hussain, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.J. Gogoi, Standing Counsel Ms. R. Bora, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.09.2026
It has been submitted at the Bar that the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant