Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/443/2026 of SMTI. JOYANTA MAIBANGSA Vs DR. RAVI KOTA, IAS AND 4 ORS on 27 September 2026
GAHC010178072026 2026:GAU- AS:14447-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/443/2026 SMTI. JOYANTA MAIBANGSA WIFE OF LATE SANTOSH HOJAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GAMADI HAWAR, P.O./P.S. - HARANGAJAO, DISTRICT - DIMA HASAO,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010178072026
2026:GAU-
AS:14447-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/443/2026
SMTI. JOYANTA MAIBANGSA
WIFE OF LATE SANTOSH HOJAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GAMADI
HAWAR, P.O./P.S. - HARANGAJAO, DISTRICT - DIMA HASAO, ASSAM, PIN-
788818.
VERSUS
DR. RAVI KOTA, IAS AND 4 ORS
CHIEF SECRETARY, ASSAM, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 06.
2:NIRAJ VERMA
IAS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
GUWAHATI - 06.
3:RAJIT KARIGAPSA
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (N)
NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL
HAFLONG
DIMA HASAO - 788819.
4:SMTI. GAYATRI DEVIDAS HYALINGE
IAS
DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
HAFLONG
DIMA HASAO
ASSAM - 788819.
Page No.# 2/2
5:RIPUNJOY KAKATI
APS
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
HAFLONG
DIMA HASAO
ASSAM
PIN - 788819
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B D DAS, MR J LOTHA,MR H K SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D NATH(R1), MS. H BEGUM(R4),MS. PAPARI B
NATH(R1),R SAHIINII(R1)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.09.2026 (K. R. Surana, J) Upon instructions, Mr. H. K. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this contempt petition, the order in reference has been complied with. Mr. D. Nath, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 is present and submits that the affidavit-in-opposition has been filed and the same be made a part of the record. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the matter stands closed on satisfaction.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant