Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1683/2025 of PRANJIT BARUAH Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS on 27 September 2026
GAHC010061412025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1683/2025 PRANJIT BARUAH S/O- LATE NRIPENDRA BARUAH, R/O- HOUSE NO. 11, MILI JULI CHOWK, MOTHER TERESA ROAD, BHASKAR NAGAR, GUWAHATI-21, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PERMANENT
GAHC010061412025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1683/2025
PRANJIT BARUAH
S/O- LATE NRIPENDRA BARUAH, R/O- HOUSE NO. 11, MILI JULI CHOWK, MOTHER TERESA ROAD, BHASKAR NAGAR, GUWAHATI-21, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILL.- KARDAITOLA, KALAG, P.O.
BARBARI, P.S. AND DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN- 781351.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARY OFFICE, NORTH
BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN- 110001.
2:THE POLICE COMMISSIONER
CYBER POLICE STATION
GUWAHATI CITY
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
PIN- 781001.
3:THE STATION HEAD OFFICER
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION
KUTCHERY CHOWK
RANCHI
JHARKHAND
PIN- 834001.
4:THE CHAIRMAN
HEAD OFFICE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA
STATE BANK BHAVAN
M.C. ROAD
NARIMAN POINT
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
PIN- 400021.
5:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
SURVEILLANCE AND INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
WEST GANDHI MAIDAN
PATNA
PIN- 800001.
6:THE BRANCH MANAGER
GEETANAGAR BRANCH
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ZOO NARANGI ROAD
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
PIN- 781024
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BARMAN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. S Ali(R-4 AND 6),MR K DAS (R-4 AND
6),DY.S.G.I.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28-09-2026 Mr. S. Barman, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the debit freeze instruction on the Bank Account of the petitioner has been removed during the pendency of the writ petition. Therefore, the petitioner has no surviving cause of action at this stage.
Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 2 and Ms. I. Das, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 – 6 are present. As it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the debit freeze instruction from the Bank Account of the petitioner has been removed, the writ petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant