Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6429/2023 of SRI ARVIND GOYAL Vs ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND 3 ORS on 27 September 2026
GAHC010248422023 2026:GAU-AS:14439 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6429/2023 SRI ARVIND GOYAL S/O RATAN GOYAL, C/O M/S GOYAL AUTO AGENCY, KAMRUPA BUILDING, A . T. ROAD, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI- 781001, DIST.- KAMRUP (METRO),
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010248422023
2026:GAU-AS:14439
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6429/2023
SRI ARVIND GOYAL
S/O RATAN GOYAL,
C/O M/S GOYAL AUTO AGENCY, KAMRUPA BUILDING, A. T. ROAD, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI- 781001, DIST.- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM.
VERSUS
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND 3 ORS
A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING DULY INCORPORATED
UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BIJULEE
BHAWAN, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI- 781001, REP. BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR.
2:THE SDO
ULUBARI ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION
APDCL (LAR)
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI- 07
DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM.
3:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
GED (C)
APDCL (LAR)
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI- 07
DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM.
4:THE GUWAHATI WHOLESALE CONSUMERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
LTD.
A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT
Page No.# 2/2
1949
HAVING ITS OFFICE AND PLACE OF BUSINESS AT A.T. ROAD
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI- 1
DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM AND REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER/ SECRETARY
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.A. Bakhtiar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Das, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.09.2026
Mr. S.A. Bakhtiar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition.
2. Mr. B. Das, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the APDCL.
3. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant