Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6397/2021 of AJAY GHOSH AND ANR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS on 27 September 2026
GAHC010201242021 2026:GAU-AS:14387 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6397/2021 AJAY GHOSH AND ANR S/O LATE SHANTI RANJAN GHOSH, R/O RANGIA RAILWAY STATION ROAD, WARD NO.1, P.O. AND P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN
GAHC010201242021
2026:GAU-AS:14387
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6397/2021
AJAY GHOSH AND ANR
S/O LATE SHANTI RANJAN GHOSH, R/O RANGIA RAILWAY STATION
ROAD, WARD NO.1, P.O. AND P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN
781354
2: GIAS UDDIN CHOUDHURY @ GIAS ALI @ GIAS ALI CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE SAMIR ALI @ SAMIR ALI CHOUDHURY
R/O RANGIA
WARD NO.5
P.O. AND P.S. RANGIA
DIST. KAMRUP(R)
ASSAM
PIN 78135
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY
OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAWAN, NEW DELHI
2:THE GENERAL MANAGER
N.F. RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI-11
3:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERICAL MANAGER
N.F. RAILWAY
RANGIA DIVISION
DIST. KAMRUP(R)
ASSAM
4:THE ASSTT. COMMERCIAL MANAGER
N.F. RAILWAY
RANGIA
DIST. KAMRUP(R)
ASSAM
5:THE STATION SUPERINTENDENT
RANGIA RAILWAY STATION
DIST. KAMRUP(R)
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T H HAZARIKA, MR M CHETIA,MR A RASHID,MR. K
ISLAM,MR N AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NF RLY, BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28-09-2026
1. Heard Mr. A. Rashid, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Railways for the respondents.
2. The challenge made in the present writ petition involves Catering licence and subsequent policy of the Railways.
3. Mr. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Railways, submits that the issue has already been determined in Deepak & Co. and Anr. Vs. the Union of India and Ors. [WP(C) No. 1828/2023].
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the determination made in the aforesaid writ petition, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant