Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3304/2026 of MS MINAKSHI ENTERPRISE Vs PABAN KR BARTHAKUR AND ORS on 27 September 2026
GAHC010201292026 2026:GAU-AS:14384 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3304/2026 MS MINAKSHI ENTERPRISE REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MINAKSHI DEKA, W/O K DEKA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 24, RAJGARH BYE
GAHC010201292026
2026:GAU-AS:14384
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3304/2026
MS MINAKSHI ENTERPRISE
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MINAKSHI DEKA, W/O K DEKA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 24, RAJGARH BYE
LANE NO. 2, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-3, DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
VERSUS
PABAN KR BARTHAKUR AND ORS
CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:S ABBASI
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:BHASKAR SARMA
CHIEF ENGINEER
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
BASIStha
GUWAHATI
4:PULAK CHOUDHURY
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
MUKALMUA PROTECTION CIRCLE
MUKALMUA.
5:DHARANI DHAR PATHAK
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
BARPETA WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
BARPETA.
6:SMT MANDIRA SARMA
ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
LOWER ASSAM ZONE
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
ASSAM WATER CENTRE
BASIStha
GUWAHATI-29.
7:SRI DIPAK BHATTACHARJEE
DEPUTY SECRETARY
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
ASSAM SECRETARIAT
DISPUR-6
8:SHRI ROHAN KUMAR JHA
IAS
DC OFFICE
MUSLIMPATTY
BARPETA
ASSAM-781301
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D K JAIN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR R M DAS
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28-09-2026
1. Mr. D. K. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant submits that there is some defects in the present application. Accordingly, he would like to withdraw the same and file a fresh application.
2. Prayer stands allowed.
3. Accordingly, the present interlocutory application stands closed with a liberty to file a fresh application.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant