Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2865/2026 of RAMJAN ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 September 2026
GAHC010207042026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2865/2026 RAMJAN ALI SON OF LATE ABDUL JALIL RESIDENT OF MOTHABARI P S BAGUAN DISTRICT GOALPARA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010207042026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2865/2026
RAMJAN ALI
SON OF LATE ABDUL JALIL RESIDENT OF MOTHABARI P S BAGUAN
DISTRICT GOALPARA ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR. S H ZAMAN,U U KHAN,MR. S. ALOM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
25.09.2026
Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional P.P. for the State respondents.
2. Invoking section 483 BNSS, the petitioner herein is seeking regular bail in Page No.# 2/2 connection with Baguan P.S. Case No. 58/2026 under section 61(2)/179/180 of the BNS, 2023. He was arrested on 12.07.2026.
3. The gist of the allegations in the FIR dated 12.07.2026 is that the petitioner had deposited some Rs.25,000/- in his own account and later, it was the currency was suspected to be fake/counterfeit.
4. The case diary was called for.
5. Mr. M.P. Goswami, the learned additional P.P., submits that in the meantime investigation stands completed, resulting in a charge-sheet. The learned Addl. P.P. submits that perhaps the petitioner can be directed to seek regular bail from the learned Court below.
6. Considering, the length of detention and the completion of investigation, the petitioner is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs.40,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Goalpara.
(i) He shall be available for trial, if one commences;
(ii) He shall not hamper or tamper;
(iv) He shall not commit any illegal activities.
7. Violation of the bail conditions will lead to cancellation of the bail.
8. This bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant