Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2444/2026 of MRIDUL ALI ALIAS MUDUL Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 September 2026
GAHC010179562026 2026:GAU-AS:14351 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2444/2026 MRIDUL ALI ALIAS MUDUL SON OF NAZAM ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DEROIGHAT, POLICE STATION - MORAN, DISTRICT DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010179562026
2026:GAU-AS:14351
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2444/2026
MRIDUL ALI ALIAS MUDUL
SON OF NAZAM ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DEROIGHAT, POLICE
STATION - MORAN, DISTRICT DIBRUGARH, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, STATE OF ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P HAZARIKA, MR. H S BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.09.2026 Heard Mr. A. Gayan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. By this petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Mridul Ali @ Mudul, praying for grant of bail in connection with Teok P.S. Case No. 76/2026 u/s 108/3(5) of BNS, 2023.
3. The petitioner was arrested on 29.07.2026.
4. The three accused persons were named in the FIR dated 28.07.2026 lodged by the husband of the deceased. The gist of the allegation is that during his absence in connection with work elsewhere, the petitioner was having a love relationship with his wife which subsequently led to a lot of distress upon her and eventually, she committed suicide.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been in custody for last 59 days vis-à-vis the applicable statutory period of 60 days.
6. The prosecution submits that in the meantime, the investigation is also completed and has resulted in a charge sheet vide C.S. No. 105/2026 dated 22.09.2026.
7. In view of length of the detention and completion of investigation, the petitioner can be granted bail at this stage subject to suitable condition(s).
8. Accordingly, the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Teok P.S. Case No. 76/2026 u/s 108/3(5) of BNS, 2023, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court.
9. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions:
(a) The accused person shall available for trial, if one commences; (b) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence; and
(c) That the petitioner shall not in any manner harm or harass or intimidate the informant or his family members;
10. Violation or breach of any condition(s) shall entail cancellation of bail.
11. With the above observations, this bail petition stands allowed and disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant