Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2583/2026 of APURBA DEBNATH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 24 September 2026
GAHC010189062026 2026:GAU-AS:14245 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2583/2026 APURBA DEBNATH S/O ANIL DEBNATH, R/O BANDARCHARA PT. II, P.S.- KOKRAJHAR, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, BTR, ASSAM, PIN- 783372 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010189062026
2026:GAU-AS:14245
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2583/2026
APURBA DEBNATH
S/O ANIL DEBNATH, R/O BANDARCHARA PT. II, P.S.- KOKRAJHAR, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, BTR, ASSAM, PIN- 783372
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:MS. LIPI DEBNATH
(VICTIM/MINOR) BEING REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER -CUM- NATURAL
GUARDIAN
SRI AMBARISH DEBNATH
S/O LATE ABANI DEBNATH
R/O BANDARCHARA PT. II
P.S.- KOKRAJHAR
DIST- KOKRAJHAR
BTR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J. HUSSAIN, MS R SAHA,MR. B J MUKHERJEE
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.09.2026
Heard Mr. B.J. Mukherjee, learned counsel for the accused. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1. Office note dated 17.09.2026, indicates that service report in respect of respondent No. 2 is awaited. Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that as per his instructions, after completion of investigation, the I.O. has submitted charge- sheet, bearing No. 32/2026, dated 30.08.2026. At this stage, Mr. Mukherjee, learned counsel for the accused submits that this petition may be closed granting liberty to the accused to approach the learned trial Court since charge-sheet has been submitted in this matter. Taking note of the submission of Mr. Mukherjee, learned counsel for the accused, this petition stands closed by granting liberty to the accused to approach the learned trial Court by filing appropriate petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant