Gauhati High Court
CRP(IO)/482/2026 of MD. ALTAF HUSSAIN @ ALTAB HUSSAIN Vs MD. TAKBIR ALI AND 5 ORS. on 23 September 2026
GAHC010211522026 2026:GAU-AS:14171 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/482/2026 MD. ALTAF HUSSAIN @ ALTAB HUSSAIN SON OF LATE RAFIK UDDIN @ ABDUL RAFIQUE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GARBHITOR, P.O.- PANIBHARAL, PIN- 784176, P.S.-
GAHC010211522026
2026:GAU-AS:14171
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP(IO)/482/2026
MD. ALTAF HUSSAIN @ ALTAB HUSSAIN
SON OF LATE RAFIK UDDIN @ ABDUL RAFIQUE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GARBHITOR, P.O.- PANIBHARAL, PIN- 784176, P.S.- BISWANATH CHARIALI, DISTRICT- BISWANATH, ASSAM
VERSUS
MD. TAKBIR ALI AND 5 ORS.
SON OF LATE VADIAYA JAMAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GARBHITOR, P.O.- PANIBHARAL, PIN- 784176, P.S.- BISWANATH CHARIALI, DISTRICT- BISWANATH, ASSAM
2:MD. MOINUDDIN
S/O LATE MAMUD ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GARBHITOR
P.O.- PANIBHARAL
PIN- 784176
P.S.- BISWANATH CHARIALI
DISTRICT- BISWANATH
ASSAM
3:MD. SABU HAQUE
S/O KETAB ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GARBHITOR
P.O.- PANIBHARAL
PIN- 784176
P.S.- BISWANATH CHARIALI
DISTRICT- BISWANATH
ASSAM
4:STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SONITPUR
TEZPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784001
5:SUB- DIVISIONAL OFFICER (PRESENTLY D.C.)
BISWANATH
ASSAM
PIN- 784176
6:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
BISWANATH
ASSAM
PIN- 78417
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MR. P BORDOLOI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. P. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the order dated 16.07.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Biswanath in Title Appeal No.02/2024.
3. The petitioner being the applicant before the Trial Court under the provision of Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure wanted to adduce additional evidence. However, the Trial Court rejected the said prayer.
4. It is a settled principle of law that the prayer under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure should be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. But, the Trial Court did not do so. Therefore, the impugned order dated 16.07.2026 is bad in law and stands set aside.
5. The learned Appellate Court is directed to consider this prayer at the time of final hearing of the appeal. With the aforesaid direction, the civil revision petition stands disposed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant