Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3369/2026 of ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Vs NUR JAHAN AND 2 ORS. on 22 September 2026
GAHC010201342026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3369/2026 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ( A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING) HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010201342026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3369/2026
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
(A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING) HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT
GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY
THE ASSISTANT MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781007.
VERSUS
NUR JAHAN AND 2 ORS.
W/O HACHEN @ HASEN ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PHANDHARA, P.O.- BHANDRA BAZAR, P.S.- MANIKPUR, DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783390
2:HACHEN ALIAS HASEN ALI
S/O LATE RACHUL MAMUD
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PHANDHARA
P.O.- BHANDRA BAZAR
P.S.- MANIKPUR
DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783390
3:MRS. MINU BEGUM
W/O MD. AJAM
R/O. LALMATI
BIHARBARI
HOUSE NO. 44
WARD NO. 17
GUWAHATI
P.O. AND P.S. - BASISTHA
DISTRICT - KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM. PIN - 78102
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R D MOZUMDAR, MR. S P SHARMA,MS. C MOZUMDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.09.2026
Heard Mr. S P Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 19 days of delay in filing the connected appeal. Going for issuing notice to the respondent would be noting but sheer waste of time. Further, the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant