Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./2526/2026 of TAFAJUL ISLAM AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010185492026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2526/2026 TAFAJUL ISLAM AND ANR S/O MD. ABDUL HAI, R/O TUMUKABORI, P.S. MIKIRBHETA, DISTRICT- MORIGAON, ASSAM. 2: ACHADUL ISLAM S/O MD. JABAN ALI R/O

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010185492026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./2526/2026

TAFAJUL ISLAM AND ANR

S/O MD. ABDUL HAI, R/O TUMUKABORI, P.S. MIKIRBHETA, DISTRICT- MORIGAON, ASSAM.

2: ACHADUL ISLAM

S/O MD. JABAN ALI

R/O GOSAIKHANDA

P.S. MIKIRBHETA

DISTRICT- MORIGAON

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S M MOLLAH, MR. M MONDAL

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 23.09.2026 Heard Mr. S.M. Mollah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 praying for regular bail to the petitioners namely (1) Tafajul Islam and (2) Achadul Islam, who were arrested on 29.06.2026 in connection with NDPS Case No. 48/2026

Page No.# 2/2 (Corresponding to Mikirbheta P.S. Case No. 89/2026) registered under Sections 21(b)/ 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

3. As per the FIR, 7.94 grams of suspected heroin was recovered from the possession of the petitioners.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the aforesaid quantity of suspected heroin would come into the category of intermediate quantity and recovery was made from the house of the petitioner No. 2 Achadul Islam.

5. The scanned copy of the TCR including the case diary is received and perused. The petitioners have spent 87 days in the custody so far.

6. Having regard to the above as well as the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted, further detention of the petitioners may not be necessary. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners named above shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- each with two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Morigaon in connection with the aforementioned case.

7. It is provided that the petitioners shall cooperate in the trial as and when trial commences and shall not try to tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation of the case and shall not intimidate to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case in any manner.

8. The petition stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead