Gauhati High Court
AB/1787/2026 of SRI APURBA KUMAR ROY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 September 2026
GAHC010163552026 2026:GAU-AS:14144 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1787/2026 SRI APURBA KUMAR ROY S/O SURENDRA NATH ROY R/O BIDYADABRI PART-III, AGAMONI, P.O. BIDYADABRI, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE
GAHC010163552026
2026:GAU-AS:14144
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1787/2026
SRI APURBA KUMAR ROY
S/O SURENDRA NATH ROY
R/O BIDYADABRI PART-III, AGAMONI, P.O. BIDYADABRI, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P KR KALITA, MR. D DAS,MS B PATHAK
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.09.2026 Heard Mr. P KR Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for the informant.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused petitioner, namely, Sri. Apurba Kumar Roy, in connection with Golakganj P.S. Case No. 173/2026, under Sections 126/115(2)/118(2)/351(2) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The allegations, as reflected in the FIR, are that the petitioner assaulted the informant, causing him to fall to the ground, and thereafter pressed his chest, as a result of which the informant fell ill. It is further alleged that the petitioner threatened to kill the informant.
4. It is submitted by the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor that the charge- sheet has already been submitted vide C.S. No. 182/2026 dated 28.09.2026.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, pursuant to the interim protection, the petitioner had appeared before the I.O., and his statement had also been recorded.
6. Having regard to the above, as well as the nature of the allegations and the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the prayer for pre- arrest bail is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, with the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police.
(ii) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the concerned police station without prior intimation to the I.O.
8. The petition stands disposed of as allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant