Gauhati High Court
AB/2207/2026 of ABDUL JALIL Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 September 2026
GAHC010198212026 2026:GAU-AS:14085 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2207/2026 ABDUL JALIL S/O LATE ABU MONDAL, R/O VILL MAJAR CHUBA, PS ORANG, PO DHANSIRI BAZAR, DIST UDALGURI, ASSAM, PIN 784114 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010198212026
2026:GAU-AS:14085
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2207/2026
ABDUL JALIL
S/O LATE ABU MONDAL, R/O VILL MAJAR CHUBA, PS ORANG, PO
DHANSIRI BAZAR, DIST UDALGURI, ASSAM, PIN 784114
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K HUSSAIN, MR. M ALOM,MS. F H AHMED,MRS. S Y
AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
23.09.2026
Heard Mr. M.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNS, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Orang P.S. Case No.33/2026, registered under Sections u/s 112/3(5)/3(6)/3(8)/3(9)/308(6)/308(7)
/ 317(4)/318(4)/319(2)/351(2)/351(3)/61(2) of BNS, 2023.
3. The allegation in the FIR is that the ejahar was lodged on 05.09.2026 by one namely Jitumani Kalita, SI of Police with the Officer-in-Charge of Orang Police Station bringing allegation inter alia that, the accused persons namely Habijul Islam, Ruful Amin, Habibur Rahman and other persons presently unknown, who, acting together as a group or gang, pursuant to a criminal conspiracy entered into between themselves and with such unknown others, and in furtherance of their - common intention and common object, are carrying on their activities in and about the precincts of Orang Police Station and are, by deception, by the assumption of a false character and by holding out the threat of false criminal prosecution, cheating and extorting money from members of the public and habitually dealing in the proceeds so obtained. Hence the FIR.
4. The case diary has been placed before this Court along with the detailed bail objection submitted by the IO. I have perused the relevant portions of the case diary. There is some progress in the investigation, but the same is still continuing.
5. Supporting the bail objection, the learned Additional P.P. submits that there are direct allegations against the petitioner. It is submitted that the investigation, including examination of witnesses, have revealed the threatening of persons by the accused petitioner with regard to their involvement in the alleged illegal activities. In view of the incriminating materials revealed lending support to the alleged offences, the privilege of anticipatory bail may not be suitable in this case.
6. Accordingly, the instant bail petition for anticipatory bail stands rejected at this stage.
7. Return back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant