Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2719/2026 of SRI BIPIN KR MAHATO ALIAS BIPIN MAHATO Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 September 2026
GAHC010189662026 2026:GAU-AS:14084 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2719/2026 SRI BIPIN KR MAHATO ALIAS BIPIN MAHATO S/O-RAJ KISHORE MAHATO P/R/O-VILL-SIRSIYA BAZAR, P.S-BELA, DIST- SITAMARI, BIHAR. VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010189662026
2026:GAU-AS:14084
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2719/2026
SRI BIPIN KR MAHATO ALIAS BIPIN MAHATO
S/O-RAJ KISHORE MAHATO P/R/O-VILL-SIRSIYA BAZAR, P.S-BELA, DIST- SITAMARI, BIHAR.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R CHETRI, MR U SAIKIA,MR. MOHIT PANDEY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
23.09.2026 Heard Mr. R. Chetri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Das, learned Additional P.P. for the State respondents.
2. Invoking section 483 BNSS, the petitioner herein is seeking regular bail in connection with Jalukbari P.S. Case No. 298/2026, registered under sections
303(2)/318(4) of BNS, 2023. The petitioner was arrested on 02.08.2026. The FIR was lodged by one Taslim on 31.07.2026.
3. The gist of the allegations is that while traveling in a city bus, two unknown persons, stating that they will buy a ticket for him and took away his mobile phone and later on, he came to know that transaction of Rs.99,025 was made from his account using Google Pay and a cash of Rs.40,000 was withdrawn. The stolen mobile is stated to have been recovered from the possession of the present petitioner.
4. The case diary is received.
5. Mr. Das, learned Addl. P.P. objects to the bail and submits that investigation has implicated the petitioner as well amongst others.
6. Nevertheless, the investigation has reasonably progressed and the petitioner is in custody for 52 days vis-a-vis the applicable statutory period of 60 days.
7. Considering, the length of detention and the progress of investigation, the petitioner is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs.40,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Kamrup (M), Guwahati.
(i) He shall cooperate with remaining investigation;
(ii) He shall be available for trial if one commences;
(iii) He shall not hamper or tamper;
(iv) He shall not commit any illegal activities.
8. Violation of the bail conditions will lead to cancellation of the bail.
9. This bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
10. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant