Gauhati High Court
AB/511/2026 of UDAY ROY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 September 2026
GAHC010049132026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/511/2026 UDAY ROY S/O SAMBHU CHARAN ROY R/O VILL- LOTKA P.O. MOTHERJHAR P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM PIN-783334. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010049132026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/511/2026
UDAY ROY
S/O SAMBHU CHARAN ROY
R/O VILL- LOTKA
P.O. MOTHERJHAR P.S. GOLAKGANJ
DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM
PIN-783334.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. K DEVI, N O POMONG
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.09.2026 Heard Ms. K. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioner namely Uday Roy, who is apprehending arrested in connection with Golakganj P.S. Case No. 24/2026 (G.R. Case No. 129/2026) registered under Sections 69/77/308(2) of the BNSS, 2023, read Page No.# 2/2 with Sections 67(a)/ 67(c) of the IT Act.
3. The case commenced with a lodging of an FIR by the informant alleging, inter-alia that the petitioner, by luring the informant, got into a relationship with her and without her knowledge, made her consume alcohol and raped her against her will. It is also alleged that when the informant was raped, the petitioner took photographs and that he objected to marry her and demanded Rs. 7 lakhs and when the informant showed her inability to pay the amount, the petitioner made the photographs viral in social media.
4. Ms. K. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier also, there was an FIR between the same parties with the same allegation and that the father of the informant and the petitioner compromised the matter amongst them and had written a compromise settlement letter to the concerned Police Officer and this is the second FIR lodged by the informant against the petitioner.
5. The learned Addl. P.P. submits the petitioner was granted interim bail by order dated 11.03.2026 pursuant to which he appeared before the I.O. and his statement was recorded and subsequently charge sheet was submitted. .
6. Having regard to the above, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. Accordingly, the interim order dated 11.03.2026, passed by this Court is hereby made absolute on the same conditions as may be applicable as on date.
7. The petition stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant