Gauhati High Court
AB/2214/2026 of SAHAJUDDIN AHMED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 September 2026
GAHC010195992026 2026:GAU-AS:14149 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2214/2026 SAHAJUDDIN AHMED SON OF LATE MD. ABDUR ROSHID, VILLAGE- BULOGARAH, PS.- DHULA, P.O- NIZ KHARUPETIA, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010195992026
2026:GAU-AS:14149
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2214/2026
SAHAJUDDIN AHMED
SON OF LATE MD. ABDUR ROSHID, VILLAGE- BULOGARAH, PS.- DHULA, P.O- NIZ KHARUPETIA, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J AHMED, J N KHANDAKAR,H G DAISY,R BEGUM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.09.2026 Heard Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner namely, Sahajuddin Ahmed, in connection with Kharupetia P.S. Case No. 92/2026 under Sections 340(2)/ 336(3)/ 318(2)/ 316(5)/316(2) /299/199/61(2) of the BNS, r/w Section 98(a) of Assam Police Act, 2007.
Page No.# 2/2
3. The allegation against the present petitioner is that he was the registered owner of the vehicle, who sold it to Yasin Ali and as such, as submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, no such involvement of the present petitioner is found.
5. Having regard to the nature of allegations as well as the aforesaid fact, the prayer for pre- arrest bail is allowed.
6. Accordingly, the interim order dated 14.09.2026 is hereby made absolute with the same terms and conditions, as may be applicable as on date.
7. Anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant