Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2883/2026 of ISLAM UDDIN AND 2 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 September 2026
GAHC010207772026 2026:GAU-AS:14140 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2883/2026 ISLAM UDDIN AND 2 ORS. SON OF KHAIBAR ALI RESIDENT OF NO 4 BARUAJHAR BECHIMARI MANGALDOI POLICE STATION DALGAON DISTRICT DARRANG ASSAM 2:
GAHC010207772026
2026:GAU-AS:14140
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2883/2026
ISLAM UDDIN AND 2 ORS.
SON OF KHAIBAR ALI RESIDENT OF NO 4 BARUAJHAR BECHIMARI
MANGALDOI POLICE STATION DALGAON DISTRICT DARRANG ASSAM
2: SAHIDUL ISLAM
SON OF HAKIMUDDIN RESIDENT OF RUHINIKASH POLICE STATION
DALGAON DISTRICT DARRANG ASSAM
3: ABDUL LATIF ALIAS LATIF HUSSAIN
SON OF NUR MAHAMMAD RESIDENT OF DAIPAM POLICE STATION
DALGAON DISTRICT DARRANG ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR A AHMED,MS. F B CHOUDHURY,MISS. P M
AHMED,U U KHAN,MR. M A CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.09.2026 Heard Mr. A Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for the grant of bail to the petitioners, namely, Islam Uddin, Sahidul Islam and Abdul Latif @ Latif Hussain, who were arrested on 07.07.2026, in connection with Tinsukia P.S.
Case
No.
156/2026
under
Sections 303(2)/305(c)/317(4)/61(2)/112(2)/3(5) of the BNS, read with Section 3(2)(b) of the Prevention of Public Property Act, 1984, read with Section 15(2)/15(4) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Amendment Act, 2011.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this Court to the FIR and to the orders passed by the learned Remand Magistrate, wherein it is reflected that the petitioners are the driver and conductor, and that some condensate oil was loaded into a night super bus.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been behind bars for 77 days. As per the forwarding report, there are also other persons involved, and the petitioners, are the drivers and the conductor of the Night Super bus. Accordingly, the petitioners submit that they would participate in the investigation and cooperate with the same if granted the privilege of bail by this Court.
5. The co-accused in the case has been granted bail at the motion stage vide order dated 25.08.2026 in Bail Appln. 2438/2026.
6. The petitioners have been in detention for 77 days, whereas the statutory period of detention is 60 days.
7. Having regard to the aforesaid period of detention and the nature of the offence, the prayer for bail is allowed.
8. Accordingly, the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Tinsukia.
9. The learned CJM shall be at liberty to impose such conditions as may be deemed necessary to ensure the participation of the petitioners in the ongoing investigation process.
10. The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission of the learned CJM.
11. The bail petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant