Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2607/2026 of DILIP KUMAR DUTTA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS on 22 September 2026
GAHC010094792026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2607/2026 DILIP KUMAR DUTTA SON OF LATE SONACHAND DUTTA, RESIDENT OF RONGPUR PT. IV,RAJPATH ROAD, P.O. - RONGPUR,SILCHAR, P.S.-SILCHAR, DISTRICT.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010094792026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2607/2026
DILIP KUMAR DUTTA
SON OF LATE SONACHAND DUTTA, RESIDENT OF RONGPUR PT.
IV,RAJPATH ROAD, P.O. - RONGPUR,SILCHAR, P.S.-SILCHAR, DISTRICT.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788009.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY,GOVT. OF
ASSAM, PENSION DEPARTMENT, SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR,ASSAM, PIN
781006.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BYTHE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARYGOVT. OF
ASSAM ENVIRONMENT
FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGEDEPARTMENT DISPUR PIN 781006.
3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF
FOREST FORCE ASSAM
ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARIGUWAHATI-781037.
4:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER CACHAR
P.O P.S. SILCHAR CACHARASSAM PIN- 788001.
5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM
MADAIMGAON BELTOLA
GUWAHATI-781029
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R SODIAL, MS S Z HAYAT,MR. RAJIB ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AG (A AND E),SC, FOREST
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 23.09.2026
Page 1 of 2
Heard Mr. M. R. Sodial, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1; Mr. S. Sharma, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 2, 3 & 4; and Ms. Tinlung, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned standing counsel, Accountant General(A&E), Assam, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 5.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for inclusion of the name of his wife i.e. Smti. Dipali Roy Dutta as a nominee in the Service Book of the petitioner for receiving the family pension in the event of his death.
3. Mr. Sodial, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the prayer made in the present writ petition has been substantially complied with by including the name of the wife of the petitioner in his Service Book for receiving family pension on account of the death of the pensioner. He, therefore, submits that this writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
4. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…