Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5207/2026 of RAJA GOGOI Vs AIRTEL PAYMENTS BANK LIMITED AND 3 ORS on 22 September 2026
GAHC010206522026 2026:GAU-AS:14162 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5207/2026 RAJA GOGOI S/O UTPAL GOGOI, R/O VILL. 1 NO. LENGERI GAON, P.S. MORAN, P.O. LENGERI BAZAR, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM- 786613. VERSUS AIRTEL PAYMENTS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010206522026
2026:GAU-AS:14162
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5207/2026
RAJA GOGOI
S/O UTPAL GOGOI, R/O VILL. 1 NO. LENGERI GAON, P.S. MORAN, P.O.
LENGERI BAZAR, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM- 786613.
VERSUS
AIRTEL PAYMENTS BANK LIMITED AND 3 ORS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER/ BRANCH MANAGER/NODAL
OFFICER, AIRTEL CENTRE, PLOT NO 16, UDYOG VIHAR, INDUSTRIAL
AREA, PHASE- IV, GURUGRAM, HARYANA -122015.
2:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
BOKARO
JHARKHAND
SP OFFICE
CAMP -II
BOKARO STEEL CITY
JHARKHAND- 827001.
3:THE OFFICER- IN- CHARGE/ INVESTIGATING OFFICER
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION
BOKARO (SECTOR- IV)
BOKARO
JHARKHAND
PIN- 827004.
4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
REPRESENTED BY ITS NODAL OFFICER
CYBER CELL
ULUBARI
GHY
ASSAM -781007
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : R AMIN, S K RAHMATULLAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.09.2026
Mr. R. Amin, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as certain formal defects have been crept in in the writ petition, the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file afresh. Mr. H. Sarma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate has submitted that the State has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Amin, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty to file afresh with proper particulars.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant