Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1091/2026 of PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE (COMMISSIONERATE), GUWAHATI AND 2 ORS Vs PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND ANR on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010064212026 2026:GAU- AS:14054-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1091/2026 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE (COMMISSIONERATE), GUWAHATI AND 2 ORS GST BHAWAN, KEDAR ROAD, MACHKHOWA, GUWAHATI- 781001,

GAHC010064212026

2026:GAU-

AS:14054-DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1091/2026

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE

(COMMISSIONERATE), GUWAHATI AND 2 ORS

GST BHAWAN, KEDAR ROAD, MACHKHOWA, GUWAHATI- 781001, ASSAM.

2: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER

GST AND EXCISE

GST BHAWAN

KEDAR ROAD

MACHKOWA

GUWAHATI-781001

ASSAM

3: THE SUPERINTENDENT

RANGE 1 F

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX

GUWAHATI DIVISION-1

ROOM NO. 215

GST BHAWAN

KEDAR ROAD

MACHKOWA

GUWAHATI-781001

ASSA

VERSUS

PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND ANR

HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PLOT NO 1D, 1E, TIRUPATI AND ASSOCIATES P

LTD., BRAHMAPUTRA INDUSTRIAL PARK, GOURIPUR, VILL.- SILA, MOUZA- SILASINDURI, KAMRUP, ASSAM- 781101, REPRESENTED BY

THEIR AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. CHITWAN PRABHAKAR

2:THE UNION OF INDIA

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

HAVING OFFICE AT UDYOG BHAWAN

NEW DELHI-11010

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C KEYAL (SR. SC, CBIC CGST), KAUSHIK JAIN

Advocate for the Respondent : ,

BEFORE

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

23-09-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J)

1. We have heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. N. Kakati, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants.

2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicants/appellants seeking condonation of the delay of 3 days in preferring the connected Appeal against the judgment and order dated 19.09.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 6960/2023.

3. Perused the averments made in the application.

4. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicants/appellants for condoning the delay of 3 days in preferring the connected appeal.

5. We, therefore, condone the delay.

6. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.

7. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect free, list it on 27.11.2026 under the appropriate heading.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead