Gauhati High Court
CRP(IO)/472/2026 of SMTI. PUJA DAS Vs ANKIT KUMAR on 22 September 2026
GAHC010204262026 2026:GAU- AS:14072-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/472/2026 SMTI. PUJA DAS WIFE OF SRI ANKIT KUMAR, DAUGHTER OF SRI BIDYA SAGAR DAS, RESIDENT OF LACHIT BORPHUKAN PATH, TETELIA, P.S.- JALUKBARI, P.O.-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010204262026
2026:GAU-
AS:14072-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP(IO)/472/2026
SMTI. PUJA DAS
WIFE OF SRI ANKIT KUMAR, DAUGHTER OF SRI BIDYA SAGAR DAS, RESIDENT OF LACHIT BORPHUKAN PATH, TETELIA, P.S.- JALUKBARI, P.O.- MALIGAON, GUWAHATI-781033, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
ANKIT KUMAR
SON OF SRI RAJESH KUMAR, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO- 315, DAHELIA, SADAT NAGAR, SHAHABAD, DIST- HARDOI, PIN- 241407, UTTAR PRADESH
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P P BORTHAKUR, A SHARMA,KAKU GOGOI,A GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. P. P. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 08.07.2026, passed by the learned Principal Judge Family Court No.III, Kamrup (Metro) at Guwahati in F.C.(Civil) Case No.1114/2024.
3. The petitioner is the plaintiff before the Trial Court, she earlier filed her evidence. Before her cross-examination, she filed a petition before the Trial Court Page No.# 2/2 praying for allowing her to adduce additional evidence, which was rejected by the Trial Court.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of the material available in the record.
5. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to adduce additional evidence on affidavit.
6. Therefore, the impugned order dated 08.07.2026 is set aside.
7. The petitioner shall be allowed to file additional evidence on affidavit as prayed for by her.
8. With the aforesaid direction, the civil revision petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant