Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4544/2026 of SMT ADITI KALITA Vs STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 22 September 2026
GAHC010179442026 2026:GAU-AS:14066 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4544/2026 SMT ADITI KALITA D/O LATE DHAMESWAR KALITA, VILLAGE SENMELA, LOKHRA, P.O. SAWKUCHI, P.S. GARCHUK, DISTRICT KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PIN 781040. VERSUS STATE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010179442026
2026:GAU-AS:14066
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4544/2026
SMT ADITI KALITA
D/O LATE DHAMESWAR KALITA, VILLAGE SENMELA, LOKHRA, P.O.
SAWKUCHI, P.S. GARCHUK, DISTRICT KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PIN 781040.
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
OF ASSAM, POWER (ELECTRICITY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI
781006.
2:THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (APDCL)
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
BIJULEE BHAWAN
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM 781008.
3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER APDCL
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 781008
4:THE CONCERNED DIVISIONAL OFFICER
APDCL
GUWAHATI
ASSAM 781008
5:THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER
BASISTHA
GARBHANGA ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION
APDCL
GUWAHATI- 781029
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM
6:SMT BIRAJA KALITA
W/O LATE DHAMESWAR KALITA
VILLAGE- DENMELA
LOKHRA
P.O. SAWKUCHI
P.S. GARCHUK
DIST- KAMRUP(M)- 781040
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A GANGULY, MR. A DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, APDCL
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. A. Ganguly, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. C. Paul, appearing on behalf of Mr. K.P. Pathak, the learned Standing Counsel for the APDCL.
2. Mr. Ganguly submits that he has received instructions from his client not to press the instant writ petition and, accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the same.
3. The prayer is allowed.
4. Writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant