Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/959/2026 of SRI TAKDIR GARH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 21 September 2026
GAHC010202922026 2026:GAU- AS:13972-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/959/2026 SRI TAKDIR GARH SON OF SRI JUGAL GARH, RESIDENT OF 1 NO.ACHINIBILGAON UNDER NAMTOLA POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OFCHARAIDEO, ASSAM-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010202922026
2026:GAU-
AS:13972-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/959/2026
SRI TAKDIR GARH
SON OF SRI JUGAL GARH, RESIDENT OF 1 NO.ACHINIBILGAON UNDER
NAMTOLA POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OFCHARAIDEO, ASSAM- 785690
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM.
2:SMTI BIMALA KAL
WIFE OF SRI SHYAM KAL
RESIDENT OF 1 NO. ACHINIBILLGAON UNDER NAMTOLA POLICE
STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF CHARAIDEO
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. K PHUKAN, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NCHUMBEMO MOZHUI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22-09-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. K. Phukan, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that Page No.# 2/2 there is a delay of 151 days in filing the appeal against conviction of the appellant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 151 days is condoned. Registry to register the appeal and list the same. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant