Gauhati High Court
AB/1991/2026 of MOTIBUR RAHMAN AND 6 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 21 September 2026
GAHC010178952026 2026:GAU-AS:14029 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1991/2026 MOTIBUR RAHMAN AND 6 ORS. S/O. MD ALI HUSSAIN, 2: MD DIL ISLAM ALIAS DINDARUL ISLAM S/O MD RUHUL AMIN 3: MD MAJAHARUL ISLAM S/O. MD RAFIBUL ISLAM 4: MD
GAHC010178952026
2026:GAU-AS:14029
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1991/2026
MOTIBUR RAHMAN AND 6 ORS.
S/O. MD ALI HUSSAIN,
2: MD DIL ISLAM ALIAS DINDARUL ISLAM
S/O MD RUHUL AMIN
3: MD MAJAHARUL ISLAM
S/O. MD RAFIBUL ISLAM
4: MD MIJANUR RAHMAN
S/O. MD MUJAMIL HOQUE
5: MD HEDAYATUL ISLAM ALIAS HEDULTUL ISLAM SO MD RUSTOM ALI
S/O. MD RUSTOM ALI
6: MD HASINUR RAHMAN
ALIAS HASIBUR RAHMAN
S/O. MD ALI HUSSAIN
7: MD MUJAMIL HOQUE
ALIAS MUJAMEL HUSSAIN
S/O. LATE HASMAT ALI
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF MOHGHULI BORGOLA
P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHOWDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.09.2026
Heard Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking pre- arrest bail to the petitioners, who are apprehending arrest in connection with North Lakhimpur P.S. Case No. 196/2026 (Corresponding to G.R. Case No. 537/2026), registered under Sections 126(2)/ 118(2)/ 351(2)/189(2)/ 191(2)/ and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the FIR has been lodged on 14.06.2026 alleging that the victim has been assaulted with sharp weapon over her head, hand, chest etc. with threat to kill her.
4. The petitioners were granted interim bail vide order dated 26.08.2026.
5. Case diary was called for, in this context, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation has been completed resulted in a charge sheet vide C.S. No. 263/26 dated 11.09.2026.
6. In view of the completion of investigation, I do not deem it necessary to cancel the interim bail and accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 14.06.2026 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions that the petitioners shall cooperate with the trial, if one commences; shall not hamper or tamper with evidence and shall not intimidate or try to influence witnesses.
7. Violation or breach of condition(s) shall entail cancellation of the bail.
8. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant