Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/876/2026 of SHRI DURGESWAR BORO Vs SMT PRANITA DAS on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010178672026 2026:GAU-AS:14045 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/876/2026 SHRI DURGESWAR BORO S/O MADAN BORO, R/O VILLAGE SILBARI , P.O. BAMUNKATA, P.S. SIMLA DISTRICT-BAKSA, ASSAM , PIN-781327 VERSUS SMT PRANITA DAS

GAHC010178672026

2026:GAU-AS:14045

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/876/2026

SHRI DURGESWAR BORO

S/O MADAN BORO,

R/O VILLAGE SILBARI ,

P.O. BAMUNKATA, P.S. SIMLA DISTRICT-BAKSA, ASSAM , PIN-781327

VERSUS

SMT PRANITA DAS

W/O- VIJAY PRASAD ,

R/O GUWAHATI LOCO COLONY, PANDU, P.S.-JALUKBARI,DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), PIN-781012

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P THAKURIA, S MEDHI,D DAITHUN BORO,MR G

KAKOTI

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. J HATIMURIA, Linked Case : OTC/0/0

SHRI DURGESWAR BORO

S/O MADAN BORO R/O VILLAGE SILBARI P.O. BAMUNKATA

P.S. SIMLA DISTRICT BAKSA

ASSAM PIN 781327

VERSUS

SMT PRANITA DAS

W/O- VIJAY PRASAD R/O GUWAHATI LOCO COLONY

PANDU

P.S.-JALUKBARI

DISTRICT KAMRUPM PIN-781012

------------

Advocate for : PRATUL THAKURIA

Advocate for : appearing for SMT PRANITA DAS

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

22.09.2026 Both sides are duly represented. Aggrieved by the concurrent findings of guilt recorded by the learned trial Court and the learned appellate Court, the applicant herein has filed a criminal revision registered and numbered as Criminal Revision Petition No.7513/2026. However, in doing so, there is a delay of 602 days, for which a delay condonation petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, registered as I.A. (Crl.) No.876/2026. It is submitted that in the meantime, the parties have arrived at a settlement quantified at Rs.3 lakhs, and the respondent/complainant has also received the same. An additional affidavit has been filed by the respondent to record that settlement. It is stated therein that the total compensation of Rs.3 lakhs was received on 05.09.2026, whereupon, a money acknowledgment receipt has been issued, which is annexed with the affidavit as Annexure-B. It is stated in the affidavit that in view of the settlement, the complainant is not willing to pursue the matter. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the delay of 602 days is hereby condoned. Accordingly, I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead