Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/4488/2019 of M/S BARAK ISPAT PVT. LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS. on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010145262019 2026:GAU-AS:13982 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4488/2019 M/S BARAK ISPAT PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (READ WITH COMPANIES ACT, 2013) AND HAVING ITS

GAHC010145262019

2026:GAU-AS:13982

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/4488/2019

M/S BARAK ISPAT PVT. LTD.

A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE

COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (READ WITH COMPANIES ACT, 2013) AND HAVING

ITS OFFICE SITUATED AT MOHANPUR ROAD, SRIKONA, SILCHAR-26, ASSAM, AND ITS FACTORY SITUATED AT DAG NO. 187, 188 OF 2ND R.S.

PATTA NO. 15 AND 161, MOUZA SRIKONA, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, REP. BY

SRI MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.

REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF

FINANCE, DEPTT. OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001

2:SECRETARY

TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

DEPTT. OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION

UDYOG BHAWAN

NEW DELHI-110107

3:JOINT SECRETARY

TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

DEPTT. OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION

UDYOG BHAWAN

NEW DELHI-110107

4:THE UNDER SECRETARY

TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

DEPTT. OF REVENUE

NORTH BLOCK

NEW DELHI-110001

5:COMMISSIONER

CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX

GST BHAWAN

KEDAR ROAD

FANCY BAZAR

GUWAHATI-781001

6:ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX SILCHAR-II

RANGE

SILCHAR

ASSAM

7:CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS

REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

DEPTT. OF REVENUE

NORTH BLOCK

NEW DELHI-11000

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M L GOPE, MS. N MECH,MS. N GOGOI,MR. NITU

HAWELIA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CENTRAL EXCISE, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 22.09.2026 Heard Ms. N. Hawelia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. C. Keyal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. R. Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the all the respondents.

2. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking setting aside and quashing of the impugned Notification dated 05.10.2017, wherein the Government of

India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry (Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion) framed a scheme of budgetary support which curtailed the benefits as promised under NEIIPP, 2007.

3. It is submitted at the Bar by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Star Cement Ltd. v. Union of India & 6 Ors., in WP(C) No. 2208/2019, in terms of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Hero Motorcorp Ltd. v. Union of India, in Civil Appeal No. 7405/ 2022, decided on 17.10.2022.

4. Relevant paragraphs of the aforesaid judgment, i.e, Star Cement Ltd (supra) reads as under: “143. In view of the very recent Judgment of the Apex Court rendered in M/s Hero Motorcorp Limited –vs Union of India (Civil Appeal No. 7405 of 2022) dated 17th October, 2022 and in view of the authoritative findings rendered by the Apex Court in the said Judgment, nothing further is required to be decided in the present proceedings. The findings rendered in the said Judgment by the Apex Court also squarely covers the issue raised in the present proceedings. It is seen that although the Apex Court has dismissed the appeals preferred by the appellants, herein, namely, Hero Motorcorp Limited and Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, the Apex Court also arrived at a finding that although the appellants therein may not have a claim in law, they do have a legitimate expectation that their claim deserves due consideration. The Apex Court therefore, permitted the appellants therein to make representation to the respective State Government as well as to the GST Council and the said representations if made will be given due consideration in expeditious manner.

144. In view of the above representations being covered by the Apex Court dated 17.10.2022 rendered in Hero Motorcorp Limited and Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, the writ petitions are dismissed. Since the Apex Court had granted the liberty to the appellant to prefer their representations before the GST council and the State Governments in terms of the findings and observations rendered in the said Judgment, similar liberty is granted to the writ petitioners herein to prefer such representations before the State Government and the GST council provided the same are in terms of the findings and the observations of the Apex Court in the Judgment of Hero Motorcorp Limited (supra) vide Judgment dated 17th October, 2022, the writ petitions are, therefore, closed in terms of the above. No order as to cost.”

5. In view of the aforesaid judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this Court, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition may also be disposed of on similar lines.

6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit appropriate representations before the State Government and the GST Council in terms of the findings and observations of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M/s Hero Motorcorp Ltd. v. Union of India (supra), vide judgment dated 17.10.2022. Upon submission of such representations, the State Government and the GST Council shall consider the same in accordance with law and in the light of the findings and observations rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid judgment.

7. Resultantly, the writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead