Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/601/2026 of KUDUS ALI ALIES MD KUDDUSH ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 21 September 2026
GAHC010116742026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/601/2026 KUDUS ALI ALIES MD KUDDUSH ALI S/O GOMED ALI, R/O VILL KHELMATI, KISHAN BASTI, PO KHELMATI, PS TEZPUR, SADAR, DIST SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010116742026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/601/2026
KUDUS ALI ALIES MD KUDDUSH ALI
S/O GOMED ALI, R/O VILL KHELMATI, KISHAN BASTI, PO KHELMATI, PS
TEZPUR, SADAR, DIST SONITPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P, ASSAM
2:SRI KRISHNA SARMAH
S/O LATE SITA RAM SARMAH
R/O VILL DULAPADONG
PS RANGAPARA
DIST SONITPUR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M HOQUE, MS J BEGUM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.Pet./723/2026
KUDUS ALI ALIAS MD KUDDUSH ALI
S/O GOMED ALI
R/O VILL KHELMATI
KISHAN BASTI
PO KHELMATI
PS TEZPUR
SADAR
DIST SONITPUR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PP
ASSAM
2:SRI KRISHNA SARMAH
S/O LATE SITA RAM SARMAH
R/O VILL DULAPADONG
PS RANGAPARA
DIST SONITPUR
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR M HOQUE
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.09.2026 Heard Mr. M Hoque, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This application has been filed praying for correction of typographical errors appearing in the order dated 25.05.2026 passed in Crl. Pet.No.723/2026.
3. In the said order, “Sessions Case No.59/2023” has been mentioned in more than one occasion. Mr. Hoque submits that the case number should have been “Sessions Case No.59/2024”.
4. The errors stand corrected.
5. Henceforth, the Sessions Case No.59/2023 appearing in the order dated 25.05.2026 passed in Crl. Pet. No. 723/2026 shall be read as “Sessions Case No.59/2024”.
6. This order shall form a part of the order dated 25.05.2026 passed in Crl. Pet.No.723/2026.
The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant