Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/8320/2022 of ROKIYA KHATUN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 17 September 2026
GAHC010268262022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8320/2022 ROKIYA KHATUN W/O. JEL HOQUE VILL. JHELTURCHAR PT-III P.O. BAGRIBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783349. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REP.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010268262022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/8320/2022
ROKIYA KHATUN W/O. JEL HOQUE VILL. JHELTURCHAR PT-III
P.O. BAGRIBARI P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783349.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
DISPUR GHY.-06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT.
DISPUR GHY.-06.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE
ASSAM UZANBAZAR GHY.-01.
4:THE DISTRICT SOCIEL WELFARE OFFICER
DHUBRI PIN-783301.
5:THE PROGRAM OFFICER
DIVISIONAL ICDS CELL
KOKRAJHAR PIN-783370.
6:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER
NAYERALGA ICDS PROJECT
BILASIPARA PIN-783348.
------------
Advocate for : MR. M U MONDAL
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
Page 1 of 2
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 18.09.2026 Heard Ms. A. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. This writ petition was filed against the orders dated 10.11.2022 and 12.10.2022, issued by the Child Development Project Officer(CDPO), Nayeralga ICDS Project, Bilasipara, and the District Social Welfare Officer, Dhubri, respectively, whereby, the No. 10 Halongpara AWC (Jhelturchar Pt-III) was proposed to be shifted at village Gutipara Pt-VII(No. 10 Dubarchar LP School) and Barwori Dubarchar LP School.
3. Ms. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that this matter has become infructuous as the No. 10 Halongpara AWC (Jhelturchar Pt-III) has been retained in its original place. She, therefore, prays that the instant writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
4. In view of the submissions as made above by Ms. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners, and not objected to by Mr. Borah, learned Government Advocate for the respondents, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…