Gauhati High Court
Crl.Pet./1300/2026 of KIRAN KONWAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 17 September 2026
GAHC010199392026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1300/2026 KIRAN KONWAR S/O SRI HOREN KONWAR, R/O SUFFRY MOHAN GAON, P.S.- SONARI, DIST.- CHARAIDEO, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR TO BE REPRESENTED BY
GAHC010199392026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./1300/2026
KIRAN KONWAR
S/O SRI HOREN KONWAR, R/O SUFFRY MOHAN GAON, P.S.- SONARI, DIST.- CHARAIDEO, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:LOOKNATH NAGARIA
S/O LATE SUDHAR NAGARIA
R/O SUFFRY OUT POST
P.S.- SONARI
DIST- CHARAIDEO
ASSAM
PIN- 78569
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI, MR B ISLAM,MR. N GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.09.2026 Heard Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1.
2. In this petition, under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, the petitioner has challenged the order, dated 04.03.2025, and all subsequent orders, passed by the learned Session Judge, Charaideo, in connection with Special (NDPS) Case No. 35/2021, under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B)/29 of the NDPS Act, arising out Sonari P.S. Case No. 153/2021.
3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned order, dated 04.03.2025, and also all subsequent orders, the learned Sessions Judge, Charaideo (hereinafter, ‘Trial Court’) has issued Non-Bailable Warrant of Arrest (for short, ‘NBWA’) against the present petitioner for default.
4. Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier represented by his counsel and on account of appointment of the said counsel of the petitioner as Public Prosecutor, he was not represented before the learned Trial Court, and that the petitioner also could not appear on the dates fixed in absence of this counsel and therefore, the learned Trial Court has issued NBWA against the present petitioner, vide order, dated 04.03.2025, and all subsequent orders.
4.1 Mr. Islam also submits that the petitioner is ready to face the trial and will appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date and therefore, he has contended to allow this petition.
5. Per contra, Mr. Sarma, learned APP, submits that the petitioner may be directed to appear before the learned Trial Court and to apply for regular bail and in the event of filing such an application, the learned Trial Court may be directed to consider the same in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances on record, this Court is inclined to dispose of this petition by directing the petitioner herein, to appear before the learned Trial Court and to apply for regular bail, on or before 28.09.2026. And in the event of filing such an application, the learned Trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law.
7. Till then, the NBWA issued against the present petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
8. In terms of the above, this Criminal Petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant