Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5062/2026 of SHELLY BEGUM LASKAR AND 3 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 17 September 2026
GAHC010193552026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5062/2026 SHELLY BEGUM LASKAR AND 3 ORS S/O. RAFIQUL HASSAN LASKAR, R/O. VILLAGE TUNDURKANDI, WARD NO. 11, P.O. SONAIMUK, P.S. SONAI, PIN CODE 788 119 DISTRICT
GAHC010193552026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5062/2026
SHELLY BEGUM LASKAR AND 3 ORS
S/O. RAFIQUL HASSAN LASKAR, R/O. VILLAGE TUNDURKANDI, WARD
NO. 11, P.O. SONAIMUK, P.S. SONAI, PIN CODE 788 119 DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM.
2: SRI RAJU BANIK
S/O. LATE GOBARDHAN BANIK
R/O. TARANI ROAD
WARD NO. 20
SILCHAR TOWN
P.S. SILCHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM.
3: SRI SAJU BANIK
S/O. LATE GOBARDHAN BANIK
R/O. TARANI ROAD
WARD NO. 20
SILCHAR TOWN
P.S. SILCHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM
4: GOBINDA BANIK
S/O. LATE GOBARDHAN BANIK
R/O. TARANI ROAD
WARD NO. 20
SILCHAR TOWN
P.S. SILCHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE
AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
CACHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM. PIN CODE 788001
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
SILCHAR REVENUE CIRCLE
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM. PIN CODE 788119
4:THE SUB-REGISTRAR
SILCHAR
O/O. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
CACHAR
SILCHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM. PIN CODE 788001
5:THE NODAL OFFICER
INTER RELIGION LAND SALE PERMISSION
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI - 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAJUMDAR, MR. JUNM LASKAR,MS. J GHOSH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.09.2026
Ms. J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that certain relevant documents are not annexed along with the writ petition inadvertently. Therefore, the petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition with liberty. Mr. S.S. Roy, learned State Counsel and Mr. J. Handique, learned Standing Counsel,
Revenue Department are present. In view of the above submission made by Ms. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant