Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2556/2026 of LALCHAN ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 17 September 2026
GAHC010188472026 2026:GAU-AS:13944 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2556/2026 LALCHAN ALI S/O LATE MOHOR ALI, R/O VILLAGE UDMARI, P.S. KALGACHIA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010188472026
2026:GAU-AS:13944
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2556/2026
LALCHAN ALI
S/O LATE MOHOR ALI, R/O VILLAGE UDMARI, P.S. KALGACHIA, DISTRICT
BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA, IMDADUL ISLAM,MR. M M ZAMAN,MR N
AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.09.2026
Heard Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for the grant of bail to the petitioner, namely, Lalchan Ali, in connection with Kalgachia P.S. Case No. 64/2026 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
3. The allegation pertains to recovery of 8.027 kgs of Ganja from the possession of the petitioner. The case has been charge-sheeted and on perusal of the materials on record, we find sufficient material against the petitioner.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor also submits that trial is yet to commence.
5. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant