Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/8321/2022 of SOFIUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 17 September 2026
GAHC010268262022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8321/2022 SOFIUL ISLAM S/O- SOBDER ALI SK, VILL- ANDAMARI (GUTIPARA PT-VI), P.O.- BAGRIBARI, P.S.- BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783349. VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010268262022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/8321/2022
SOFIUL ISLAM S/O- SOBDER ALI SK,
VILL- ANDAMARI (GUTIPARA PT-VI),
P.O.- BAGRIBARI, P.S.- BILASIPARA,
DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783349.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-06.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE
ASSAM UZANBAZAR GHY-01.
4:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER
DHUBRI PIN- 783301.
5:THE PROGRAM OFFICER
DIVISIONAL ICDS CELL
KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370.
6:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER
NAYERALGA ICDS PROJECT
BILASIPARA PIN- 783348
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL, MR A ALIM SK,A A AHMED,MR K
ISLAM,MD. I H KHAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
Page 1 of 2
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 18.09.2026 Heard Ms. A. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. This writ petition was filed against the orders dated 10.11.2022 and 12.10.2022, issued by the Child Development Project Officer(CDPO), Nayeralga ICDS Project, Bilasipara, and the District Social Welfare Officer, Dhubri, respectively, whereby, the 8 No. Middle Andamari AWC was proposed to be shifted at Choudhurir Char 1026 No. M.V. School.
3. Ms. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that this matter has become infructuous as the 8 No. Middle Andamari AWC has been retained at its original place. She, therefore, prays that this writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
4. In view of the submissions as made above by Ms. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, and not objected to by Mr. Borah, learned Government Advocate for the respondents, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…