Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3326/2026 of NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs DIPAMANI MAJUMDAR AND 3 ORS. on 17 September 2026
GAHC010190202026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3326/2026 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED AND INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO.
GAHC010190202026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3326/2026
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
A COMPANY REGISTERED AND INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES
ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO. CBD-81, NEW
TOWN, KOLKATA-700156 AND ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G. S.
ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI-5, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF
REGIONAL MAN
VERSUS
DIPAMANI MAJUMDAR AND 3 ORS.
W/O HEMAKANTA MAJUMDAR,
2:HEMAKANTA MAJUMDAR
S/O LATE PADRAM MAJUMDAR
BOTH ARE PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SINGIA PANIGAON
P.S. SAMAGURI
DISTRICT-NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782140.
3:RIYAJUL HOQUE
S/O HABIBUR RAHMAN
VILLAGE KOCHAGAON
P.O. SAIDARIA
P.S. RUPAHIHAT
DISTRICT-NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782125.
5:MD FAKHRUL ISLAM
S/O MD. T. ISLAM
VILLAGE DALBARI
P.O. SOLMARI
P.S. MORIGAON
DISTRICT-MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782104
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. S ROY, MS DHRITI HAZARIKA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR ADITYA AGARWALA, FOR CAVEATOR,MR. A R
AGARWALA
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.09
. 2026 Heard Ms. D. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. A. Agarwala, learned counsel for the Caveator/respondent Nos.1 and
2.
2. The instant application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicle Act, has been preferred praying for condonation of delay of 31 days in filing the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the learned Member, MACT, No.1, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 976/2018.
3. This Court has gone through the pleadings and is of the view that sufficient cause has been shown to explain the delay of 31 days in filing the appropriate in MAC appeal.
4. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay of 31 days is condoned.
5. The Registry is directed to register the main MAC appeal and thereafter list the same for admission a week. The Registry shall also reflect the name of Mr. A. Agarwala counsel for the respondent No. 1 and 2.
6. Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant