Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5094/2026 of SMTI ANITA DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 17 September 2026
GAHC010203232026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5094/2026 SMTI ANITA DAS WIFE OF SRI KULDIP DAS, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 21, NEBEN BORA PATH, NEAR MANASHA MANDIR, P.O. P.S. - GARCHUK, GUWAHATI, PIN - 781035, ASSAM.
GAHC010203232026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5094/2026
SMTI ANITA DAS
WIFE OF SRI KULDIP DAS, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 21, NEBEN BORA
PATH, NEAR MANASHA MANDIR, P.O. P.S. - GARCHUK, GUWAHATI, PIN - 781035, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI PIN-781006
2:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
STATEFED BUILDING
GMC HOSPITAL ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI PIN-781005
3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
STATEFED BUILDING
GMC HOSPITAL ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI PIN-781005
4:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
PANBAZAR
GUWAHATI PIN-781001
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP METROPOLITAN
RUPNAGAR
GUWAHATI
PIN-78103
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEURI, MR. D J DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS,SC, G M D
A,SC, GMC
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 18.09.2026
Heard Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. S. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Affairs, GMDA & GMC for the respondent nos. 1 – 4; and Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. P.K. Medhi, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 5. Mr. Deuri after making submissions for some time, has submitted that the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition in order to avail other appropriate remedy as permissible under the law. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is not pressed, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to take recourse the appropriate remedy, as permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant