Gauhati High Court
AB/1294/2026 of MEHER JAMAL HOQUE @ MEHER JAMAL @ BERAKATA AND 7 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 16 September 2026
GAHC010118532026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1294/2026 MEHER JAMAL HOQUE @ MEHER JAMAL @ BERAKATA AND 7 ORS S/O-SURAT ZAMAL. 2: SUKUR ALI S/O-SURAT ZAMAL 3: SURAT ZAMAL S/O-GOLAP ROHMAN. 4: MEHEJA KHATUN W/O-SURAT
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010118532026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1294/2026
MEHER JAMAL HOQUE @ MEHER JAMAL @ BERAKATA AND 7 ORS
S/O-SURAT ZAMAL.
2: SUKUR ALI
S/O-SURAT ZAMAL
3: SURAT ZAMAL
S/O-GOLAP ROHMAN.
4: MEHEJA KHATUN
W/O-SURAT ZAMAL.
5: SHARJINA KHATUN @ SARJINA BEGUM
W/O- MEHER JAMAL HOQUE @ MEHER JAMAL @ BERAKATA.
6: ARJINA KHATUN
W/O-SUKUR ALI.
7: SHORIFA KHATUN
W/O-MOYNUL HOQUE @ MONIRUL ISLAM.
8: MOYNUL HOQUE @ MONIRUL MONIRUL ISLAM
S/O-MD. BAHARUDDIN. PETITIONER NO. 1 TO 6 ARE VILL-SIMLABARI
(GAROJAN). PETITIONER NO.7 AND 8 ARE VILL-KORTIMARI. ALL ARE P.S- LAKHIPUR DIST-GOALPARA
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HOQUE, F ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.09.2026 Heard Mr. M. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that charge has already been submitted being CS No.127/2026 dated 30.07.2026. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Court Below and file appropriate application and till then, he may be protected. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Goalpara within a period of 14 days from today. The interim order passed by this Court shall stand extended by another period of 14 days from today. Anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant