Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/961/2026 of SRI PARESH CHOUDHURY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 16 September 2026
GAHC010205032026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/961/2026 SRI PARESH CHOUDHURY S/O-DINA CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-CHANAKA P.S-MAYONG DIST- MARIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P, ASSAM Advocate
GAHC010205032026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/961/2026
SRI PARESH CHOUDHURY
S/O-DINA CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-CHANAKA P.S-MAYONG DIST- MARIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY P.P, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H P GUWALA, S SATNAMI,S FAZIL
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./2521/2026
SRI PARESH CHOUDHURY
S/O DINA CHOUDHURY
R/O VILLAGE-CHANAKA
P.S.-MAYONG
DISTRICT-MORIGAON
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR H P GUWALA
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
17.09.2026
Heard Mr. H.P. Guwala, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner. This interlocutory application has been filed for seeking correction of certain purported typographical errors in the order dated 14.09.2026 passed in Bail Application No. 2521/2026, whereby, the petitioner was granted bail. It is pointed out that in para 2 of the order, the P.S. case number has been wrongly mentioned as Mayong P.S. Case No. 53/2024 instead of Mayong P.S. Case No. 53/2026. Further, in the same para, the date of arrest was mentioned as 20.06.2024 instead of 20.06.2026. In the 3rd paragraph also, the date of the FIR has been mentioned as 15.06.2024 instead of 15.06.2026. The aforesaid errors are typographical errors and hereby stand corrected. This order shall be read as part of the order dated 14.09.2026, passed in Bail Appln. 2521/2026. Accordingly, this I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant