Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/955/2026 of MAZOM ANSARI ALIAS MD MAZUM ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 16 September 2026
GAHC010188162026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/955/2026 MAZOM ANSARI ALIAS MD MAZUM ANSARI S/O-AHAMMAD ALI VILL-SONAMOI P.S.-LAKHIPUR DIST-GOALPARA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE
GAHC010188162026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/955/2026
MAZOM ANSARI ALIAS MD MAZUM ANSARI
S/O-AHAMMAD ALI
VILL-SONAMOI
P.S.-LAKHIPUR
DIST-GOALPARA
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P.
ASSAM.
2:SRI CHABIN BORO
S/O- LATE GANESH BORO
VILL-THAMLA AMBARI
P.S.-MASHULPUR
PIN-781372. DIST-BAKSA
BTAD
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR. J AHMED
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.09.2026
Heard Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1.
2. In this application, under Section 430(1), BNSS, 2023, the applicant has prayed for suspension of conviction and sentence imposed upon him, vide judgment dated 24.04.2024 and sentence dated 26.04.2024, passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Baksa, in Sessions Case No. 6/2022, which was upheld vide judgment and order dated 22.07.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Baksa, in Criminal Appeal No. 6/2024.
3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment dated 24.04.2024 and sentence dated 26.04.2024, learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Baksa (‘trial Court’, for short) had convicted the applicant to undergo simple imprisonment for five years, under Section 511 IPC, read with Section 366(A) IPC.
4. Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the connected revision petition, notice has already been issued and the records have also been called for from the learned Courts below, and that the applicant was allowed to remain on previous bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Baksa, and as such, there is a requirement of suspending the sentence so handed down by the learned trial Court. Mr. Ahmed also submits that the applicant may be allowed to go on bail in connection with Sessions Case No. 6/2022.
5. Since notice has already been issued and the records have also been called for from the learned Courts below, this Court is inclined to allow the applicant to go on fresh bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-, with surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Baksa. Further, till disposal of the connected revision petition, the sentence, so handed down by the learned trial Court, stands suspended.
6. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant