Gauhati High Court

AB/1331/2026 of SRI TRAILYA GOGOI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM, on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010123872026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1331/2026 SRI TRAILYA GOGOI AND ANR S/O-SRI BHUPEN GOGOI, R/O-HAHCHARA LATUM GAON, P.O-HAHCHARA, P.S-SIVASAGAR, DISTRICT-SIVASAGAR, ASSAM. 2: SRI BOKUL DOWARI S/O-LATE AKONI

GAHC010123872026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/1331/2026

SRI TRAILYA GOGOI AND ANR

S/O-SRI BHUPEN GOGOI, R/O-HAHCHARA LATUM GAON, P.O-HAHCHARA, P.S-SIVASAGAR, DISTRICT-SIVASAGAR, ASSAM.

2: SRI BOKUL DOWARI

S/O-LATE AKONI DOWARI

R/O-DEMOW

P.O P.S-DEMOW

DISTRICT-SIVASAGAR

ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM,

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. P BORAH, MR. K GOGOI

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 16.09.2026 Heard Ms. P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K.K. Das, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 praying for regular bail to the petitioners namely (1) Sri Trailya Gogoi and (2) Sri Bokul Dowari, who were arrested on 26.07.2026 in connection with Sivasagar P.S. Case No. 56/2026 registered under Sections 191(2)/ 126(2)/ 117(2)/ 109 of the BNS, 2023.

3. The brief facts of the case in the FIR is that, on 09.04.2026 during night time, when the victims were returning home after having dinner, they were attacked by a group of miscreants causing serious injuries upon them which required their hospitalization. The present petitioners were among the said miscreants who assaulted Bidyut Saikia and Pranjit Gogoi and attempted to kill them.

4. The present FIR has been lodged by another person namely, Amlanjyoti Gogoi, who came to learn about the incident and visited the injured persons.

5. The CD as called for has been received and perused.

6. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the case is registered under Sections 117(2)/109 of BNS, besides Sections 191(2)/126(2) of BNS and none of the said offences except Section 109 of BNS is punishable for more than 7 years imprisonment. It is further submitted that Section 109 of BNS relating to attempt to commit the offence of murder is unlikely to be attracted in the present BNS, 2023.

7. On perusal of the case diary, it appears that there are incriminating materials against the petitioner but the injury report indicates assault by blunt weapon.

8. Pursuant to interim protection granted by this court, the petitioners have appeared before the IO and their statements have also been recorded, as revealed in the CD.

9. Having regard to the above, further custodial interrogation of the petitioners may not be necessary. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. The order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 18.06.2026 is hereby made absolute.

10. The petition stands allowed as aforesaid. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead