Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2014/2026 of THE STATE OF ASSAM Vs GROUP M MEDIA INDIA PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS. on 15 September 2026
GAHC010082122026 2026:GAU- AS:13692-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2014/2026 THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF TOURISM, ASSAM, GOVT. OF ASSAM. VERSUS GROUP M MEDIA INDIA PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS. A
GAHC010082122026
2026:GAU-
AS:13692-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2014/2026
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF TOURISM, ASSAM, GOVT. OF
ASSAM.
VERSUS
GROUP M MEDIA INDIA PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS.
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES
ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT COMMERZ, 8TH FLOOR, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PART, OBEROI GARDEN CITY, OFF. WESTERN
EXPRESS HIGHWAY, GOREGAON (EAST), MUMBAI- 400063 AND ALSO
HAVING ITS OFFICE AND CARRYING ON BUSINESS FROM KOLKATA
HAVING ITS LOCAL ADDRESS AT 30, BONDED ROAD, KOLKATA- 700019, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI GAUTAM GANGULI
2:GAUTAM GANGULI
SON OF DR. DEBA PRASHAD GANGULI
R/O D.L 148
SECTOR-2
SALT LAKE
KOLKATA- 700091
3:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO TOURISM
DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
TOURISM DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
5:THE SECRETARY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 0
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D K SARMAH, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A K BHUYAN, N.R. SHARMA,MS. P KASHYAP,P
BHOWMICK,MR. P GAYON,MR. A KHOUND,MS. N CHOUDHURY,MS. B BHUYAN
BEFORE
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16-09-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J)
1. We have heard Ms. M. Bhattacharya, learned Additional Senior Government Counsel, for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. N. R. Sharma, learned counsel, for the respondents/opposite parties.
2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of the delay of 254 days in preferring the connected writ appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 14.07.2025, passed by learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.7324/2013.
3. Perused the averments made in the present application.
4. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that the applicant/appellant has sufficiently explained the reasons of delay and has been able to substantiate that the reason beyond its control. We do not see any negligence, lack of bona-fide or inaction on the part of the applicant/appellant.
5. Thus, having considered the explanation tendered by the applicant/appellant, this Court is satisfied that the delay occasioned in preferring the connected writ appeal was neither deliberate nor actuated by negligence but resulted from bona-fide circumstances beyond the control of the applicant/appellant. In the absence of gross laches or mala-fide intention attributable to the applicant/appellant, this Court would lean in favour of the adjudication on merits.
6. Accordingly, in the interest of justice and having satisfied that the causes shown are sufficient to condone the delay, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay.
7. Accordingly, the instant Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
8. Registry shall process the connected Writ Appeal and, if the same is found defect free, list it on 25.11.2026 under the appropriate heading.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant